Atlanta Personal Injury Lawyers Blog

Thursday morning, a 23 year old man from the Atlanta metro area caused a fatal accident after running a red light. Police believe he may have been texting which distracted him from watching for the traffic signal. The car accident happened near Athens, Alabama at about 7:00 am. The 59 year old victim was on her way to work and died at the scene. Although both drivers were wearing seatbelts, the Georgia man was driving a 350 Chevrolet truck and the woman was driving an Acura. The State Highway Patrol is still investigating the wrongful death and has not yet determined charges.

This car accident will only add fuel to the debate in many state legislatures as to a ban on texting whiled driving. As recently reported, the Federal Motor Carrier Administration banned texting for all commercial bus and truck drivers on January 26, 2010. Georgia and Alabama both have proposals before their legislatures related to banning text messaging while driving.

There are many issues involved in the debate such as enforcement. How does the state enforce that type of law? They really can't until there is an accident and they subpoena the cell phone records - it isn't much different than enforcement of DUI laws.

Opponents of the law suggest that there may be better alternatives than putting additional laws on the books - we do have laws that cover wrongful deaths in traffic accidents. They are proponents of education in safety and driver "distractability." Just as the number of DUI's has declined over the past 20 years with high profile ads, education in the schools, and safety campaigns by states and the Federal government, we could reduce the number of accidents caused by distractions (i.e., cell phone use, texting, eating, reading the newspaper) with well-planned education and safety campaigns. For example, simple tests like the one posted previously in this blog are eye-opening as to the impact of texting while driving. Maybe it should be tied to getting a drivers license?

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) recently issued an order banning all in-cab texting by commercial truck and bus drivers. Because the DOT has the authority to regulate interstate truck and bus safety, it was able to immediately put this rule into effect due to the number of truck accidents caused by distracted driving. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood stated "To put this dangerous behavior in perspective, researchers at Virginia Tech found that truck drivers who send text messages on a cell phone are about 23 times more likely to get into some type of crash or near-miss than drivers who keep their eyes on the road." The Virginia Tech study found that drivers take their eyes off the road for almost 5 seconds when texting which is equal to driving the length of a football field at 55 mph without looking at the road.

Early release data from the National Highway Safety Administration indicates 4,229 people were killed in accidents involving large trucks in 2008. No data related to the cause of the accidents has been released yet. By way of comparison, in 2007 there were 4,808 people killed in truck accidents with 5.8% of those accidents involving distracted driving. So the good news is there is a downward trend in the number of deaths due to truck accidents and with this new ban on texting by large truck drivers, those numbers should continue to decline.

Texting and distracted driving have become such an issue that twenty states have already banned texting and driving by all drivers and 23 more are considering legislation, including Georgia. Georgia's bill has been sent back to a committee to determine how such a law could be enforced. We will continue to follow the bill in Georgia and keep you up to date as it moves through the legislature.

Continue reading "Texting Banned to Prevent Trucking Accidents" »

In Lilburn, Georgia, a texting teen crashed into a telephone phone. While typing a text to a friend and he ran off the road - the impact broke the pole in two. The young man suffered a traumatic head injury due to the impact of the accident. Gwinnett Police plan to charge him with improper use of a cell phone while driving and failure to maintain his lane.

Cell phone usage and texting while driving are distractions that are widely recognized as a cause of traffic accidents. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), approximately 16% of all fatal crashes were caused by driver distraction. While this distraction factor includes more than cell phone usage, it is estimated that at any given moment 11% of drivers are using an electronic device while driving.

In fact, the Federal government is so concerned with cell phone use while driving they have joined with the National Safety Council in forming FocusDriven, a nonprofit organization which will focus on raising awareness of the dangers of distracted driving. FocusDriven is modeled after MADD which successfully changed America's drinking and driving habits.

Placing the focus on educating the public about the high rate of car accidents caused by cell phone use is a great idea.

Slip and fall rates are particularly high among those over 65 years of age. About one third of those injured in a slip and fall will have permanent limitations in their daily living activities.

So what exactly is a slip and fall injury and what damages arise out of the injury? Slip and fall injuries are a category of premises liability and arise out of legal duties of the property owner owed to the general public. For example, a customer in a store slips in a puddle of water created by a leak in the roof. As a result of the fall, he has several broken bones and permanent injuries to his hand. If he is successful at proving the negligence of the property owner in failing to maintain the premises, he can then proceed to request damages.

There are three basic categories of damages: 1) economic damages; 2) noneconomic damages; and 3) punitive damages. Because punitive damages include the extra burden of proving gross negligence, we will not discuss them here.

Economic damages are the money lost due to the injury. Medical expenses and lost wages are the two most common economic damages claimed. Economic damages can be easy to prove through pay stubs, tax returns or W-2 forms. Medical bills will show the exact monetary loss for healthcare related expenses due to your injuries. However, future medical expenses and lost income will often require expert testimony or at least a report from an economist who can estimate the cost of long term care and the loss of future earnings and then place a present value on that number.

Noneconomic damages are often referred to as pain and suffering. This type of damages has no set monetary value and in Georgia is determined by the conscience of an enlightened judge or jury. Pain and suffering includes, physical and emotional or psychological pain. Often, the injured party's own testimony or that of family and friends will be the evidence relied on to award damages for pain and suffering.

Continue reading "Slip and Fall Injuries in Georgia" »

The National Highway Safety Traffic Administration has compiled a statistical analysis of alcohol-related driving accidents between 1982-2005. Over the twenty year period, the number of alcohol-related car accidents has declined from 53% to 33% in car accidents involving at least one impaired driver. Holidays show the highest percentage of accidents due to drunk driving while weekdays have the lowest percentage of these types of accidents.

The report found that certain laws tended to deter alcohol-related driving. I am sure you know most of these. Georgia lowered its legal blood alcohol limit to .08 as did many other states. Laws were enacted to permit the suspension of driver's licenses for those who refuse a breath test. The minimum drinking age was raised in the 1980's by Ronald Reagan when he tied the law to federal funding of state highways. Additionally, it became illegal for anyone under the age of 21 to have a blood alcohol level of over .02. Alcohol education has worked as shown by the continued reduction in alcohol -related accidents.